Biostar TF7050-M2

Written by Richard Swinburne

August 8, 2007 | 14:05

Tags: #690g #7050 #am2 #atx #hdcp #hdmi #igp #micro #motherboard #onboard #spdif

Companies: #amd #biostar

Gaming Performance:


Call of Duty 2

1600x1200 4xAA 8xAF, Maximum Detail

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 50.7
  • 48.6
  • 47.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Quake 4

1600x1200 4xAA 8xAF, Maximum Detail

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 91.6
  • 90.9
  • 90.8
0
25
50
75
100
Frames Per Second - higher is better

Half Life 2 - Episode 1

1600x1200 4xAA 8xAF, Maximum Detail

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 77.1
  • 76.6
  • 75.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Frames Per Second - higher is better

FEAR 1.08

1600x1200 4xAA 8xAF, Maximum Detail

  • Biostar TF7050-M2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (7900 GTX)
  • MSI G965MDH (7900 GTX)
  • 49
  • 49
  • 47
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frames Per Second - higher is better

At high resolution, with higher details we expect the field to show even less split, but the Biostar is consistently performing better than the other platforms in every single game, even if it's by just a few frames per second.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04